Twitches

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Loading..
    Loading..

    Powered by Squarespace
    Wednesday
    10Mar2010

    Benign Data

    Two weeks ago while whining about the things that I missed while I didn't have my laptop, I wrote that it seemed inevitable that we would begin to see monitors or projectors of various species begin to show up in non-traditional spaces, like the office lobby, the break-room, the living room, and the kitchen.  This would be the result of falling costs in display mediums and the increasing power of networked graphics processors.  Then just Monday the Google Public Data Explorer launched and I pontificated about the growing need to become more data savvy.  So naturally on the very next day I come across this excellent example of where cheap networked displays meets data savviness:    

     

          To truly understand what you're looking at here you ought to trot over and read the whole blog post, but the teaser version is that you're looking at an office status monitor at the offices of Panic, a software development company.  This one monitor contains vital information on the status of customer service tickets, calendars, revenue, development progress, and even public transportation data for employees who commute.  From the perspective of visual design it is impeccable and worth noting, but more importantly the data displayed here is crucial to their day to day business and consolidates and displays it in such a manner that it saves the individual employees the time and energy it would take to track down these pieces of information on a regular basis on their own--over and over again.

      This kind of status board is not a novel idea, in the sense that train stations and airports have had them forever and the corkboard is a pretty old contraption.   What's original here is the concept of placing vital real-time data in the most convenient place for employees to use it, rather than locking it inside of a server, behind a password and inside a mail client and a calendar client and a web browser.  Obviously there is some dangerous--in the sense of being sensitive--data that belongs behind a password on a central server.  But there is often a great deal of useful data that a company, organization, or family, could safely publicly display.  This is benign data and it very often gets bundled up with the dangerous data and locked away, making it less accessible and therefore less useful.  One of the things that can separate a good company from a great one is the way in which it leverages its data to make it more efficient and deliver better support to its customers.  You can get better leverage from having more granular control over what data gets put behind a password with limited user access and what data gets opened up for all or almost all to use.  So much time gets spent talking about and implement network security yet very little time is spent on how to give employees, customers, or individuals datasfaction--a term I'm coining to define the state of being when you have the information you need, when you need it, without having to work for it.  If the future is going to be about efficiencies--and of course it is--then data efficiency is going to have to become a second language for those of us who wish to compete in the world the internet is creating. 

    Monday
    08Mar2010

    Data, Data Everywhere

    One of the things about Google that seems to scare people is the amount of data that they collect on individuals and the things that they do on the web.  If you've never done it, I'd suggest looking at your own Google web history to get some sense of the magnitude of the data trail you leave on the web.  On the one hand, you have the creepy feeling that you're being watched.  On the other hand, these search histories help Google deliver better search results to you and everyone else.  Data is an increasingly double-edged sword, giving efficient transactions and more targeted answers as a byproduct of diminished privacy.  It's an argument we'll likely be having as a culture for another generation or two.  

      What's important here, however, is not that Google sucks up our data like a rabid vacuum cleaner in the sky.  The critical thing is that this be a two way street.  Google learns about us, and we learn about Google.  Or, put into more broad terms: Institutions collect our data and we get access to it as a result.  We need to become shareholders in the data market.   Information, and more importantly its organization into meaningful equations has never been so close to the surface before.  Never before has the human race had the opportunity to gather and interpret such large samples of data about itself--and that opportunity would be a shame to overlook or give over solely to those who collect the data.  

      Toward that end, Google has recently introduced a tool that has the potential to take the power of search and visual data manipulation to the largest data sets in the world.  Google Public Data Explorer gives the user access to huge (albeit limited at the moment) pieces of data on all kinds of subjects.  The potential here for census information, government data, educational data, research data, and so much more is hard to overstate.  One of the more dissapointing problems in education is the translation and interpretation of the primary sources, often just data, into a meaningful lesson--one that is often not the only interpretation or even the correct one.  This tool makes cutting out that interpretive middle-man incredibly simple, putting the student in control of how that data gets arranged.  Tangentially, learning to arrange and interpret large sets of data is a crucial skill this tool could help teach to the generations who are going to be exposed to it from day one.  

      The tool is more of a toy now, lacking enough data sets to make it truly powerful.  But if Google keeps feeding this library of data sets we might some day have a repository for the human condition by the raw numbers--for everyone to see and extrapolate from.  

    Friday
    05Mar2010

    Friday Live: "Hysteria" by Muse

    In approximately 12 hours this song will melt my face.  Red suit optional.

     

    Wednesday
    03Mar2010

    Good News, Bad News

     Good News:

    MLB At Bat app for iPhone

      Now that Olympic Curling has come and gone, the Lakers have things well in hand, and there are 32 days until the Major League Baseball season opener, it's time to get this fantastic app for your iPhone or iPod Touch.  Yes, it's more expensive this year, $15, but it was a steal last year at $10.  For $15 you get every regular season game (geographical blackouts excepted) live with streaming video, audio, stats, news, and push notifications.  It is without a doubt the best example of an excellent iPhone OS app I could think of.  

    Bad News:

    Apple sues HTC over everything

      Apple is suing HTC, a leading smartphone manufacturer, for 20 patent infringements.  This is the idiotic result of a terribly broken patent system and Apple not having the class and dignity to let their competitors compete.  

    Good News:

     Virgin America moves to HTML5

       This is excellent news because it shows that you can move to an open standards based platform and still compete.  It's also good news because it means I'm still right to think that Adobe Flash is the bane of the internet.   

    Bad News:

    We're Doomed

    "I studied journalism, my college degree there in communications. And now I am back there wanting to build some trust back in our media. I think the mainstream media is quite broken and I think there needs to be the fairness, the balance in there — that’s why I joined Fox. Fair and balanced, yes. You know because, Jay, those years a go that I studied journalism it was all about the who, what, when, where, and why, it was not so much the opinion interjected in hard news stories," - FNC pundit Sarah Palin.

    Hat Tip to Andrew Sullivan for catching this one.

     

    Good News:

    Valve cleverly announces Steam for Mac...maybe more?

    The one downside to using OS X is that many quality game manufacturers have long refused to build their games to run on both Windows and OS X.  The reasons for this are many and they mostly have to do with Windows having the marketshare that it does.  However, as Apple's marketshare continues to rise, these game developers are throwing away larger and larger pieces of potential profit by ignoring OS X.  Well, it looks like Valve, perhaps the second greatest game developer of all time, will be making an announcement soon regarding their future on the OS X platform.  Call me giddy.  

     

    Good News/Bad News:

    USPS to end Saturday delivery

    Hard to quantify this as anything other than something they should have done nearly a decade ago.  In fact, as soon as we all decided that this internet thing was here to stay, they should have dramatically overhauled their services.  So much correspondence, and more importantly, advertising spam, has been replaced by e-mails that it's not at all surprising this institution is losing money.  The bad part is, it's hard to see how any of the jobs that will inevitably be lost are going to be easily replaced.  

     

     

    Tuesday
    02Mar2010

    Daemon

    Just a little over a year ago I was in the Las Vegas Airport looking for something to read on my flight back to New York.  But the shelves of the McCarran airport book nook stores were plastered with churned out books on politics, the end of the world, or both--topics I have more than enough opinion on myself.  There were a few promising titles amid the smarmy mug of Joel Osteen and Nicholas Sparks novels, but most were ones I had already read or didn't want to risk not finishing because they were started as a throw-away airplane read.  I was walking around with a copy of What Would Google Do? (which I would later read and enjoy) when I came across the last copy of Daniel Suarez's Daemon.  Assuming the nature of the book from it's title, the back cover revealed only that it was a work of fiction and that Craig Newmark, creator of Craigslist, had given a quote in support of the book.  That was enough for me and I tossed WWGD aside and bought Daemon.

    By the time my flight pushed back from the gate it would have taken a severe and sudden loss of altitude to pry that book from my hands. When the plane landed I had read roughly 300 pages and the book was finished before I slept that night.  It hooked me, to put it mildly.  What I was hooked on was a story that I had never read before.  Unique in so many respects, Daemon held a genuinely original plot based on science fiction that was more science than fiction.  The story moved at a rapid pace, carefully weaving a nearly overwhelming amount of real world technology into a fantastic narrative which left me with that sublime realization, "This could happen!  No.  This is happening."

    Daemon presents a world in which a distributed artificial intelligence, a piece of intelligence that is not sentient but instead is more akin to the world's most complex Choose Your Own Adventure book, begins to slowly change the world we live in through the power it can wield via the internet and our networked systems--whether we like it or not.  It manipulates our infrastructure as well as society with the calm logic that only a computer program can muster.  The classics like Terminator or 2001: A Space Odyssey suggest that the real threat is artificial intelligence.  Daemon suggests that instead the threat comes from a "smart" infrastructure in the hands of human intelligence with a powerful will to manipulate it.

    A few weeks ago Suarez's much anticipated sequel, Freedom™ arrived and I immediately purchased it as an audiobook and began listening.  Freedom™ picks up exactly where Daemon left off, but the whole of the reader's perspective on the events in Daemon and the characters embroiled in the conflict is turned on its head.  Suarez makes it increasingly difficult to determine right from wrong and the good from the bad in this future where the real civilizations of the world meet the contrived civilizations of World of Warcraft or Everquest.  In fact, it is hard to tell where the fall of one society ends and the rise of another begins--and even if you could spot that line, Suarez makes it difficult to rest a moral judgement upon it.  

    The two books together form an engrossing example of a future.  A future in which our technology coexists with us in a symbiotic relationship.  As an unabashed futurist I find the ideas in these books fascinating and even compelling.  Others may find it horrifying.  In either case, it is a future worth reading about, if only because it is a future not very far off at all.