Twitches

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Loading..
    Loading..

    Powered by Squarespace
    Saturday
    06Feb2010

    STS-130: Endeavour to ISS

    If you happen to be a fan of both football and space exploration, tomorrow is going to be a very long day.  Space Shuttle Endeavour is set to launch from Kennedy Space Center at 4:39am, EST.  Approximately 14 hours later, the Superbowl kicks off between the Saints and the Colts.  Clearly, you'll need to set an alarm.  

    This shuttle mission, one of the final five shuttle missions we are ever going to see, will install Tranquility node on the International Space Station, as well as the robotics control cupola.  Tranquility node is the final US-built piece of the space station, and will greatly expand the space aboard the station for the many vital systems that have been temporary held in other nodes, awaiting its arrival.  The robotics cupola, or "A Room with a View" as NASA is calling it, will give the astronauts a 360 degree viewing angle on the Earth and approaching vehicles.   

    While you can always watch the shuttle launches on the cable news networks, if you have access to a computer and a decent internet connection, I highly recommend watching the launch from SpaceVidCast.  Their feed comes direct from NASA in HD and it also allows you to listen in on the comm traffic between the Shuttle, the launch facility, and Houston.  

    Friday
    05Feb2010

    Friday Live: "Baba O'Riley" by The Who

    Just in case you need to get ready for the Superbowl:

     

    Tuesday
    02Feb2010

    Space Race 2.0

    The budget for NASA in fiscal year 2011 was released yesterday (along with the budgets for everyone else) and it's not a wet, sloppy kiss for NASA officials or their friends in congress.  The new budget, while still larger than last year's, calls for the end of the Constellation program--which was to take us back to the moon--as well as the Ares rockets that were going to actually get us there.  The budget points out that NASA was both over-budget and behind schedule on both projects.

    Instead, the budget intends to fund further robotic space exploration--which has proven to be very cost efficient in the past decade--focus NASA's priorities on climate science, fostering commercial space flight, and eventually establishing a manned mission to Mars.  If I might paraphrase, the budget reads something like this: "NASA should be focused on the sciences and the unexplored space while fostering commercial exploration of that which NASA has already conquered."  

    On the one hand, I find this new budgetary direction disappointing.  I had hoped to see moon landings in my lifetime, and now, barring some incentive for a commercial program to undertake it, that is essentially out of the picture.  On the other hand, however, there is a certain pragmatism to this new direction that is one part based on getting the most our of our science dollars and one part based on the crawl of inevitability.  Robotic exploration is an efficient expenditure.  Robots can operate in space and other harsh conditions in ways that humans cannot, and at a fraction of the cost.  They aren't as glamourous in the public eye, but they get the job done.  Commercial space flight is also a worthy expenditure of NASA's time and money.  Even if all the commercial space community achieves in the next twenty years is low earth orbit maintenance schedules to the ISS, launching commercial satellites, and maintenance of existing satellites then it will have achieved more in that time than NASA has in the previous twenty.  Regular, safe commercial spaceflight in our immediate orbit is a requirement for any future exploration beyond our moon.  There will be complaints from numerous parties that manned space flight is too dangerous for private enterprise to be trusted with, but the truth of the matter is that private space launches are already common and used by the government and the military to launch critical satellites all the time.  

     

    Virgin Galactic's Space Ship TwoThe most important thing that this budget does is create a second space race--the race to be the commercial leader in cargo transportation and maintenance in space.   The budget sets aside billions of dollars in incentives and rewards to private enterprise that reaches the goals set forth by NASA for manned and unmanned spaceflight.  Companies like Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, and Spaceport America are well positioned to take advantage of these incentives and speed up their ambitious projects to make space travel a safer and more common practice, with NASA acting in much the same way the FAA currently regulates air travel.  

     

     

    Undoubtedly there will be congressional representatives from Florida, Alabama, Texas, and Utah who will hope to "reform" this budget and bring it--and its massive governement contracts--back to the facilities in their states.  However, in this political and economic climate, my guess is that they will be unsuccessful and that the NASA budget will pass through congress largely as it was submitted.  

     

     

     

    Friday
    29Jan2010

    The iPad

     

    "People always clap for the wrong things."  -  Holden Caulfield

    The Catcher in the Rye

     

     

    I don't know if you've heard, but Apple announced a new product yesterday, called the iPad.  The hype surrounding it was almost obscene in its ability to pierce across broad spectrums of society.  Everyone was talking about it.  So naturally it was a little disappointing when we all found out that it wasn't going to give us the promotion we wanted or reduce our income taxes.  

      Several of those people I know who I would consider technology aficionados, or at least hobbyists, have asked me for my opinion of Job's latest Second Coming, and while I don't want to wax philosophic on it, I do have an opinion or two.  

      The preface to this is that I already own Apple products.  In fact, I love the Apple products I own.  My MacBook Pro is my only computer.  I use it at work all day.  I have an iPhone which has without a doubt made my life easier and changed the way I think about data storage and how we interact with it.  I own an Apple Airport Extreme (the most functional and stable wireless router in the commercial market) and an Airport Express.  In short, I am an unabashed fan of Apple software and hardware engineering.  But I don't own any Apple stock, sadly, and have nothing to gain or lose from the success or failure of this new iPad.

      This is not a product I feel I need.  When I first saw an iPhone, I knew I wanted one.  When I finally got one in my hand and played with one, I knew I needed one.  I do not feel that way at all about the new iPad.  Like many I was disappointed at first by the relatively modest nature of the iPad.  There was nothing revolutionary about it's interface.  Nothing revolutionary about its methods for retrieving and playing back content.  There was no revolutionary technology implemented. Even the name is obvious and fairly bland.  The more I think about it, however, the more I realize that this is because I am not the target demographic and this is not the iPhone, this is the iPod.  When the iPhone was introduced it was revolutionary.  Even without looking at its staggering sales numbers, the proof of this is apparent in how every one of its competitors attempts to follow the iPhone's form and function.  How many large touchscreen mono-piece phones were in existence before the iphone, and how many have there been since?  The iPhone was an immediate hit with consumers and even most of the punditry, though there are some excellent quotes from those who blew that call entirely at the time.  By contrast, the iPod was neither revolutionary nor an overnight sensation with consumers.  A friend linked me to this excellent forum thread from an Apple news site from the day of the first iPod's announcement back in 2001, and it brilliantly illustrates how even Apple's biggest fans were underwhelmed by the iPod's debut.  I found this posting particularly poignant:

    I have no use for an Mp3 player.

    My house has a CD player.
    My car has a CD player.
    My Mac has a CD player

    I don't use headphones.

    The iPod requires me to change my lifestyle to meet it's needs...

    I need round holes, not square holes.

    For $99 I might buy the toy, for $399? Why?

    Doesn't a Mac with a CDR undermine the need for most of this? All that's left is the number of songs you can play and the ability to listen to all of them with headphones anywhere. Do I really need ALL my songs ALL the time?

    uhm, no.

    Won't last.

     

    The iPod was one of many mp3 players coming out that year and was by no means the cheapest.  It was also a Mac only device.  The above commenter's statement, while certainly amusing in hindsight, is not completely out of line for the time.  More important than the way that the iPod changed the way we consume music by making it easier and faster than anything else had, was the way in which the iPod filled a technological gap that most of the world did not recognize as being there at all--until it was.  

    This new iPad has the same potential.  It is not the first tablet style computer, by any means.  Nor is it the most feature filled.  There are many pieces of technology that Apple could have added, but didn't.  At the risk of attracting the cliche police, this is a case where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts and the computer geeks--people like me--are losing the forest for the trees.  The list of things it is missing if it were a computer is long, but the iPad is not a computer, it's a media appliance.  It's technological marvels are not that it pushes the envelope of what a computer can do, but that it pushes the envelope of what a piece of consumer technology can do--specifically the longest battery life for a full color, capacitive tablet media device of that size at a price that is more than competitive.  Steve Jobs was very specific in his address.  Apple is now the largest mobile devices company in the world.  And as a mobile device for browsing the web and communicating--99% of what 99% of computer users do with their computers--the iPad is going to be tough to beat.  

      There's always the chance that this device could flop.  It wouldn't be the first Apple device to hit a wall of consumer indifference.  But if I had any money to bet, it'd be on the iPad being the sleeper hit of the early half of this decade.  I suspect there will be a lot of iPad 2.0s and 3.0s under Christmas trees in 2011 and 2012.  

    Friday
    29Jan2010

    Friday Live: "Catch Me NOw I'm Falling" by The Kinks

    It's been that kind of week.